tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5627217252049778760.post6584991221391012305..comments2023-11-03T10:38:42.202-07:00Comments on Commission and Regiment: 40mm Figure Comparison: Romanoff v. Sash & SaberECW 40mm Projecthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16170190784599775214noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5627217252049778760.post-46495297512310798012014-07-28T01:40:15.762-07:002014-07-28T01:40:15.762-07:00funny, looking back on this post, I wonder if I...funny, looking back on this post, I wonder if I'm not just obsessing a bit about the aesthetics of it all.sculpting style, weapon size and the distorting effect of colors will probably make the figs relative size appearance alter. If I use muted tones on a large fig, and brights on a smaller one, it will probably be unnoticeable.ECW 40mm Projecthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16170190784599775214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5627217252049778760.post-48392072926020995812013-12-14T09:40:45.015-08:002013-12-14T09:40:45.015-08:00I don't think they'd mix well in a regimen...I don't think they'd mix well in a regiment. Certainly a big bulky fellow or two is all part of the reality of humanity. But if one went that direction you'd need some smaller guys as well. it'd be great if someone sculpted a personalities pack in 40mm and they were in fact bigger and smaller. Warlord 25mm has a bunch of that, with famous big fellows really being bigger, etc. With the Romanoff, they could basically sculpt another body or two that are thinner, smaller. In any event, it's not critical and may be less noticeable with paint. All I need is some time to get back to this project!ECW 40mm Projecthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16170190784599775214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5627217252049778760.post-50118501036944530282013-11-30T06:26:37.102-08:002013-11-30T06:26:37.102-08:00Hmmm, to be honest I don't see much difference...Hmmm, to be honest I don't see much difference between these 2. The heads, weapons and bulk look similar to me, not precisely the same but comfortable with each other, well within human variation as Jeff points out . Do they really stand out at arms length?<br /><br />Anyway, to each their own of course.Ross Mac rmacfa@gmail.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04053555991679802013noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5627217252049778760.post-56464946870669428722013-09-19T17:39:16.780-07:002013-09-19T17:39:16.780-07:00I think it falls into the "it all depends&quo...I think it falls into the "it all depends" category. sometimes a larger figure is just fine, sometimes not. Depends on sculpting style, weapons size, etc. I'll play it as I see it going along, but for now I'll probably keep them in separate units in general.<br /><br />Jacdaw is another whole animal, haven't even gotten any of them yet, nor Drabant.ECW 40mm Projecthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16170190784599775214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5627217252049778760.post-88143083601026957292013-09-17T11:50:38.384-07:002013-09-17T11:50:38.384-07:00Each to his own taste of course, but people don...Each to his own taste of course, but people don't come in one "standard size". <br /><br />And while it is true that I work in a different scale, I am more concerned with how closely the equipment (particularly muskets) match than I am with body shape and size . . . up to a point, of course.<br /><br />From what I see I certainly wouldn't have a problem with them on the same table and probably not in the same unit . . . but for your army, your eye is the more important one.<br /><br /><br />-- JeffBluebear Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05171345165563779232noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5627217252049778760.post-92205846669062343802013-09-17T04:54:42.914-07:002013-09-17T04:54:42.914-07:00I mix Romanoff, Jacdaw, and Irregular in foot regi...I mix Romanoff, Jacdaw, and Irregular in foot regiments - the S&S as you say are just a bit smaller.<br /><br />-- Allantidders2https://www.blogger.com/profile/01858990279764140459noreply@blogger.com